Spinning up a Windows lab has always been the part that slows everything down: ISO downloads, long installers, drivers, snapshots, licensing, and the whole “I only needed this for one quick test” problem.

That’s why projects like dockur/windows are getting attention. The core idea is straightforward: run a full Windows virtual machine (QEMU/KVM), but package and operate it like a container. You still get a real Windows desktop and a real Windows kernel — you just manage it with the convenience of docker compose.

This is not “Windows as a container” (like Windows Server Core/Nano Server images). It’s Windows as a KVM-accelerated VM, wrapped in a Docker-friendly deployment experience.

Why this approach is resonating

For sysadmins, homelabbers, and teams building repeatable labs, the appeal is mostly about workflow:

Infrastructure as Code for Windows labs: define vCPU, RAM, disk size, language, and version through environment variables in a Compose file.
Automated install: the project is designed to streamline first boot and installation steps so you can get to a usable system faster.
“Disposable” environments with persistence when you want it: keep the VM disk in a volume when the lab should live, or tear it down cleanly when you’re done.
Friendly access paths: use a web viewer for initial setup and switch to RDP when you want a smoother daily experience.

The important “fine print” (no hype)

The secret sauce is KVM. That also means there are hard rules:

You need a Linux host (or an environment that can expose KVM properly) with /dev/kvm available to the container.
If you’re running on a VPS or inside another VM, you may need nested virtualization — and many providers don’t allow it.
Some setups require elevated privileges or extra capabilities (for example to access devices or advanced networking), which changes the threat model compared to typical containers.

In short: treat it like a VM you’re controlling through Docker, not like a sandboxed microservice.

Security and licensing: two things you shouldn’t gloss over

Security
Because this runs a VM through a container runtime and often needs extra permissions, the safest mindset is: “This is powerful, so isolate it.” If you’re doing malware analysis or running untrusted code, it’s best on a dedicated box, a segmented VLAN, or a controlled lab host.

Licensing
Even if the automation is convenient, Windows still requires proper licensing/activation depending on your use case. Convenience doesn’t change compliance.

FAQ

Is this the same as Microsoft Windows Containers?
No. Windows Containers run Windows userland while sharing a Windows kernel. dockur/windows runs a full Windows VM using QEMU/KVM, then exposes it through a Docker-style workflow.

What Windows versions can it run?
The project supports selecting different Windows editions via configuration (for example desktop and server variants). Availability depends on the options documented in the repository.

Why does it need KVM?
KVM provides hardware acceleration. Without it, performance and sometimes viability drop sharply. This is the key reason it’s “Windows in a Docker workflow,” not “Windows as a normal container.”

I increased the disk size — why doesn’t Windows show the extra space?
Because the added space is typically unallocated until you extend the partition inside Windows (Disk Management).

Is it a good idea for production workloads?
Usually it’s better suited for labs, CI-style workflows, testing, troubleshooting, and short-lived environments. Production virtualization stacks exist for a reason — especially around security boundaries, observability, and lifecycle controls.

Sources: